You are probably thinking about libel against public figures. That generally requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with actual malice, which in turn usually requires either showing that the defendant knew their statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for whether they were true or false.
For libel against someone who is not a public figure the defendant does not have to have known their statements were false. The plaintiff just needs to prove the defendant was negligent.
For libel against someone who is not a public figure the defendant does not have to have known their statements were false. The plaintiff just needs to prove the defendant was negligent.