I did not argue that it was inert. I actually argued that
1.) not really doing what enthusiasts claimed it was specifically doing.
2.) making people become develop bizarre beliefs and generally become irrational.
It can be a cult pseudoscience while not being inert.
1.) not really doing what enthusiasts claimed it was specifically doing. 2.) making people become develop bizarre beliefs and generally become irrational.
It can be a cult pseudoscience while not being inert.