Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The YouTube size estimates represent between 10 and 15 exabytes, that's not a possible volume for Torrents.

Since filming, editing, and streaming videos already consumes users' storage and bandwidth resources anyway, the total amount of resources available to a P2P torrent-style network clearly is already in the ballpark of what's needed for YouTube.

> Serving the video fast with adaptive quality and having the available bandwidth close to the user is another much larger problem.

No idea how well it works in practice, but in theory PeerTube has already solved this using WebTorrent.

The nice thing about P2P is that your network's capacity scales organically with load. More users⇒More capacity.



> Since filming, editing, and streaming videos already consumes users' storage and bandwidth resources anyway, the total amount of resources available to a P2P torrent-style network clearly is already in the ballpark of what's needed for YouTube.

I doubt it because a lot of this content doesn't exist outside of Youtube and because the content does exist on external drives has not internet connectivity or capacity to get it.

> No idea how well it works in practice, but in theory PeerTube has already solved this using WebTorrent.

It seems to currently have 220K users, not exactly what I would call representative or a success for that matter.

> The nice thing about P2P is that your network's capacity scales organically with load. More users⇒More capacity.

Only if they agree to themselves share the content they host which is not necessarily the case.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: