Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Also in 1939, people did not have experience self-organizing into bands of likeminded internet-enabled jerks. I posit this helped avoid civil strife immeasurably.


If you put three people in a room, two clubs will be formed immediately that leave one of them out. Internet has nothing to do with it.


So the two clubs have a membership of exactly 1 person each, and the remainder of exactly 1 person is unaffiliated?

Why not two clubs with 1 permanent member each, with one person swinging between them? Why not one club with 2 or 3 people? Why not 3 "clubs"?

Why must it be as you describe?


Don’t overthink this


Too late. It remains your move.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: