A very easy decision for some, depending on their own strength of conviction. Anybody knows that Harris is not running to retaliate against those who do not agree with every policy that her people can get her party to support, but Trump is and he makes it very clear that if elected he intends to do harm that Harris will not do. Bigly.

So without consideration for upside[0], one of the most emotionless decisions a top executive can make is when there is no downside versus when there is.

[0] After all, further upside is not necessary if you already have experienced enough to where the needle can not move any further.