Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a terrible analogy.

It's quite clear that the author means AI writing is now good enough to cause confusion and speculation as to whether a given piece of writing was human-authored.

The confusion and speculation caused by your nude transit adventure is about what the hell you're doing and why.



> now good enough to cause confusion and speculation

since when is "confusion and speculation" an indicator of quality/goodness?


Logic failure.

> maybe LLMs are seen to write as well as humans because most humans have poor reading comprehension skills?

Whoa, ironic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: